#RUBY HTTP CLIENT FULL#
#RUBY HTTP CLIENT CODE#

Hurley: Intended to be a successor to Faraday.

Easy to log and do REST actions.”Ĥ% of the votes went to libraries that weren’t listed, including:

Easy to set the timeout, which I often have to do. vcr by Myron Marston (myronmarston) Record your test suite's HTTP interactions and replay them during future test runs for fast, deterministic, accurate tests.

Patron (1%): “Curl-based, but with a nicer API than Curb. Testing your client webmock by Bartosz Blimke (bblimke) Library for stubbing and setting expectations on HTTP requests in Ruby.

Curb (3%) “Our benchmarks showed that curb is by far the fastest one.”.

Excon (3.2%) “Excon don’t have extra dependency such as curl, easy to use and customize, easy to handle errors, has feature to debug”.

mutual auth)” “Straightforward API that I don’t have to look up every time I use it.”

HTTP.rb (3.7%): “ Thread safety (I have some Jruby projects), a sane API for SSL (e.g.

#RUBY HTTP CLIENT CODE#

HTTPClient (4.9%): “ Thread-safe, uses keepalive, fast, no C code (cross-platform I use a lot of JRuby).” “ Supports ENV and especially ENV out of the box, supports http streaming.”.Typhoeus (5.8%): “Concurrent requests and multipart posts actually work.”.Rest-Client (10.7%) “ Easy api, just works, can do file uploads, and have never had a problem with it.”.But respondents also praised its robustness and stability. Not surprisingly, one of the main selling points of Net::HTTP was that it’s always there, without adding a dependency. I’m actually a little surprised to find that Faraday is that much more popular than using Ruby’s built-in HTTP client library. This one got 13% of the vote, a drop-off of more than 11 points behind Faraday. They liked the ability to modify its behavior with middlewares, as well as the ability to swap out backend libraries. Commenting why they chose it, respondents not surprisingly tended to focus on its flexibility. 2nd: FaradayĪs a personal favorite of mine, it made me happy to see Faraday at #2, with 24.4% of the vote. Factors people cited for their preference include simplicity and ease of use, as well as familiarity. However, At 26.2% of responses, HTTParty is the most popular library, slightly edging out Faraday. And the winner is…Īctually, there are no winners or losers here.

#RUBY HTTP CLIENT FULL#

You can check out the results for yourself, or look at the full list of responses, but here are some highlights. I’ve since collected over 700 responses, which seems like a pretty decent sample. You can just get to work using ES.A few weeks back I asked what ruby HTTP client library folks preferred. In either case, you don't have to worry about formatting things in the exact way ES expects, you don't have to manage the connections, etc. If you're working with an existing ES instance that doesn't conform to the way searchkick works, I'd just use elasticsearch-ruby.

It works really well and works more 'the Rails way,' rather than trying to build it up from scratch. Then, once the request cycle ends, the object will be GC'd and the connection closed. The best idea is to create a connection class, something like: class ElasticSearch You’ll need to send an HTTP request & then process the response. You've got a long-running process (the server, any workers, etc.) that will leave that connection open as long as the process runs. Rest-Client Rest-client is a simple HTTP and REST client for Ruby, inspired by the Sinatra microframework sort of specifying actions: get, put, post, delete. However, you're talking about using Rails. It comes as no surprise that Ruby Toolbox ranks this gem as the leader of all Ruby HTTP clients.

In that case, a constant is perfectly fine. Plain old ruby scripts and small console apps typically expose things globally, especially if you're only working in a file or two to grab some information, perform a quick search, etc. You're on r/ruby, not r/rails, so you're likely going to get a different response depending on the commenter. There's a difference between Ruby and Rails.

Ruby http client